La Roche-Posay Anthelios Melt-in Milk Sunscreen SPF 60 vs CeraVe Foaming Facial Cleanser 16 oz (3606000537750)
What separates them
These two differ on 3 recorded specifications. The La Roche-Posay Anthelios Melt-in Milk Sunscreen SPF 60 is ₹1,000 dearer.
La Roche-Posay Anthelios Melt-in Milk Sunscreen SPF 60 vs CeraVe Foaming Facial Cleanser 16 oz (3606000537750)
La Roche-Posay
La Roche-Posay Anthelios Melt-in Milk Sunscreen SPF 60
₹2,490
SPF does not scale the way people read it: SPF 30 blocks about 97 percent of UVB and SPF 60 about 98, so doubling the number buys one percentage point.
Full details →
CeraVe
CeraVe Foaming Facial Cleanser 16 oz (3606000537750)
₹1,490
pH around 5.5 is the specification that matters in a cleanser and is almost never stated.
Full details →Who the La Roche-Posay Anthelios Melt-in Milk Sunscreen SPF 60 is for
Buy it if: Anyone who will apply a proper quarter teaspoon and reapply every two hours.
Avoid it if: Anyone applying a thin layer once a day and expecting SPF 60 protection.
Who the CeraVe Foaming Facial Cleanser 16 oz is for
Buy it if: Normal to oily skin wanting a pH-balanced, genuinely fragrance-free daily cleanser.
Avoid it if: Dry or dehydrated skin, which should use the Hydrating Cleanser instead of the Foaming one.
Specifications, side by side
3 of 19 rows differ. Differences first.
| Specification | La Roche-Posay Anthelios Melt-in Milk Sunscreen SPF 60 | CeraVe Foaming Facial Cleanser 16 oz |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ₹2,490 | ₹1,490 |
| Fragrance | Fragranced | Fragrance free |
| Key actives | Avobenzone 3 percent, homosalate 10 percent, octisalate 5 percent, octocrylene 10 percent | Ceramides 1, 3 and 6-II, niacinamide, hyaluronic acid |
| Volume | 90 ml | 473 ml, 16 oz |
| Mains voltage | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| Period after opening | 12 months after opening | 12 months after opening |
| Warranty | 1 Year Official Brand Warranty | 1 Year Official Brand Warranty |
| Ceramides | not published | The lipids that make up the skin barrier. A cleanser containing them removes less barrier than it strips |
| Comedogenic | not published | Non-comedogenic |
| Finish | Milky, absorbs without a white cast | not published |
| Fragrance free | not published | Genuinely, not merely unscented with a masking fragrance |
| How SPF scales | Not linearly. SPF 30 blocks about 97 percent of UVB and SPF 60 about 98 percent. Doubling the number buys roughly one percentage point | not published |
| pH | not published | Around 5.5, close to skin's own, which matters because a high-pH cleanser disrupts the barrier |
| Reapplication | Every 2 hours in sun, and after swimming or heavy sweating | not published |
| Suits | not published | Normal to oily skin. Dry skin should use the Hydrating version instead |
| Surfactants | not published | Includes sodium lauroyl sarcosinate, which is milder than sodium lauryl sulfate |
| UVA | SPF measures UVB only. UVA causes most ageing and tanning and is rated by the PA system, which US-labelled sunscreens do not carry | not published |
| Water resistance | 80 minutes, which is a tested claim rather than a marketing one | not published |
| What actually matters | Quantity. SPF is measured at 2 mg per square centimetre, about a quarter teaspoon for a face, and almost nobody applies that much. Applying half gives far less than half the rated protection | not published |
| Why pH matters | not published | Traditional soap sits around pH 9 to 10 and leaves skin tight. A pH-balanced cleanser does not |
Every row is a figure one or both products record. A blank is a figure the catalogue does not hold, not a zero.
Compare the La Roche-Posay Anthelios Melt-in Milk Sunscreen SPF 60 with something else →