Fisher-Price Learn to Walk Zebra Baby Walker (FZC22) vs Chicco Bravo Trio Travel System Baby Stroller (06079640990070)
What separates them
These two differ on 3 recorded specifications. The Chicco Bravo Trio Travel System Baby Stroller (06079640990070) is ₹31,991 dearer.
Fisher-Price Learn to Walk Zebra Baby Walker (FZC22) vs Chicco Bravo Trio Travel System Baby Stroller (06079640990070)
Fisher-Price
Fisher-Price Learn to Walk Zebra Baby Walker (FZC22)
₹2,999
This needs saying plainly rather than in a footnote.
Full details →Chicco
Chicco Bravo Trio Travel System Baby Stroller (06079640990070)
₹34,990
The certification point needs stating plainly.
Full details →Who the Fisher-Price Learn to Walk Zebra Baby Walker is for
Buy it if: Nobody, on current paediatric guidance. A stationary activity centre is the recommended alternative.
Avoid it if: Any household with stairs, and any parent who has not read the paediatric position on this product category.
Who the Chicco Bravo Trio Travel System Baby Stroller is for
Buy it if: Anyone who has confirmed the seat can be correctly and safely installed in their specific car.
Avoid it if: Anyone who needs a seat certified to the Indian AIS-072 standard, or who cannot verify correct anchoring.
Specifications, side by side
3 of 16 rows differ. Differences first.
| Specification | Fisher-Price Learn to Walk Zebra Baby Walker | Chicco Bravo Trio Travel System Baby Stroller |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ₹2,999 | ₹34,990 |
| Age grading | Manufacturer states from when a child can sit unaided to about 12 months | Car seat 1.8 to 15 kg; stroller to about 22 kg |
| Safety | Baby walkers were banned from sale in Canada in 2004 and the American Academy of Pediatrics has called for a ban. Read the verdict before buying | The car seat is certified to the US standard FMVSS 213. It is not certified to AIS-072, the Indian standard, nor to UN R44 or R129 |
| Weight | 4.5 kg | Stroller 10.5 kg, seat 4 kg |
| Warranty | 1 Year Official Brand Warranty | 1 Year Official Brand Warranty |
| Certification | not published | FMVSS 213, the US federal standard. Indian regulation is AIS-072, and UN R44 or R129 are the other accepted standards here |
| Does it help walking | No. The evidence indicates walkers do not accelerate independent walking and may slightly delay it, because the child pushes with toes rather than using the muscles walking requires | not published |
| Expiry | not published | Car seats expire, typically 6 years from manufacture, because the polymer degrades. The date is moulded into the shell |
| Height settings | 3 | not published |
| If installed by belt | not published | Belt installation is possible in most cars, but the seat is still not certified to the Indian standard |
| If used at all | Only on one level with no stair access, for short supervised periods, and never near a kitchen or bathroom | not published |
| Regulatory position | Canada prohibited the sale, import and advertising of baby walkers in 2004. The AAP has recommended a ban in the US. They remain legal in India | not published |
| Safer alternatives | A stationary activity centre or a push-along walker, neither of which moves the child | not published |
| Second-hand warning | not published | Never buy a used car seat -- crash history is invisible and expiry is often past |
| Stroller | not published | One-hand fold, to about 22 kg |
| Why the injuries happen | A walker moves a child faster than an adult can react, and the commonest serious injury is a fall down stairs while in the walker | not published |
| Why this is not paperwork | not published | US seats are designed around the LATCH anchor system; Indian and European cars use ISOFIX. The standards differ on anchor spacing and top tether, so a US seat may not anchor correctly in an Indian car |
Every row is a figure one or both products record. A blank is a figure the catalogue does not hold, not a zero.
Compare the Fisher-Price Learn to Walk Zebra Baby Walker with something else →
