Chicco Bravo Trio Travel System Baby Stroller (06079640990070) vs Fisher-Price Learn to Walk Zebra Baby Walker (FZC22)
What separates them
These two differ on 3 recorded specifications. The Chicco Bravo Trio Travel System Baby Stroller (06079640990070) is ₹31,991 dearer.
Chicco Bravo Trio Travel System Baby Stroller (06079640990070) vs Fisher-Price Learn to Walk Zebra Baby Walker (FZC22)
Chicco
Chicco Bravo Trio Travel System Baby Stroller (06079640990070)
₹34,990
The certification point needs stating plainly.
Full details →
Fisher-Price
Fisher-Price Learn to Walk Zebra Baby Walker (FZC22)
₹2,999
This needs saying plainly rather than in a footnote.
Full details →Who the Chicco Bravo Trio Travel System Baby Stroller is for
Buy it if: Anyone who has confirmed the seat can be correctly and safely installed in their specific car.
Avoid it if: Anyone who needs a seat certified to the Indian AIS-072 standard, or who cannot verify correct anchoring.
Who the Fisher-Price Learn to Walk Zebra Baby Walker is for
Buy it if: Nobody, on current paediatric guidance. A stationary activity centre is the recommended alternative.
Avoid it if: Any household with stairs, and any parent who has not read the paediatric position on this product category.
Specifications, side by side
3 of 16 rows differ. Differences first.
| Specification | Chicco Bravo Trio Travel System Baby Stroller | Fisher-Price Learn to Walk Zebra Baby Walker |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ₹34,990 | ₹2,999 |
| Age grading | Car seat 1.8 to 15 kg; stroller to about 22 kg | Manufacturer states from when a child can sit unaided to about 12 months |
| Safety | The car seat is certified to the US standard FMVSS 213. It is not certified to AIS-072, the Indian standard, nor to UN R44 or R129 | Baby walkers were banned from sale in Canada in 2004 and the American Academy of Pediatrics has called for a ban. Read the verdict before buying |
| Weight | Stroller 10.5 kg, seat 4 kg | 4.5 kg |
| Warranty | 1 Year Official Brand Warranty | 1 Year Official Brand Warranty |
| Certification | FMVSS 213, the US federal standard. Indian regulation is AIS-072, and UN R44 or R129 are the other accepted standards here | not published |
| Does it help walking | not published | No. The evidence indicates walkers do not accelerate independent walking and may slightly delay it, because the child pushes with toes rather than using the muscles walking requires |
| Expiry | Car seats expire, typically 6 years from manufacture, because the polymer degrades. The date is moulded into the shell | not published |
| Height settings | not published | 3 |
| If installed by belt | Belt installation is possible in most cars, but the seat is still not certified to the Indian standard | not published |
| If used at all | not published | Only on one level with no stair access, for short supervised periods, and never near a kitchen or bathroom |
| Regulatory position | not published | Canada prohibited the sale, import and advertising of baby walkers in 2004. The AAP has recommended a ban in the US. They remain legal in India |
| Safer alternatives | not published | A stationary activity centre or a push-along walker, neither of which moves the child |
| Second-hand warning | Never buy a used car seat -- crash history is invisible and expiry is often past | not published |
| Stroller | One-hand fold, to about 22 kg | not published |
| Why the injuries happen | not published | A walker moves a child faster than an adult can react, and the commonest serious injury is a fall down stairs while in the walker |
| Why this is not paperwork | US seats are designed around the LATCH anchor system; Indian and European cars use ISOFIX. The standards differ on anchor spacing and top tether, so a US seat may not anchor correctly in an Indian car | not published |
Every row is a figure one or both products record. A blank is a figure the catalogue does not hold, not a zero.
Compare the Chicco Bravo Trio Travel System Baby Stroller with something else →