Apple MagSafe Battery Pack Wireless Power Bank vs Anker 737 Charger 120W GaN Prime 3-Port Wall Fast Charger
What separates them
These two differ on 1 recorded specification. The Apple MagSafe Battery Pack Wireless Power Bank is ₹2,901 dearer.
Apple MagSafe Battery Pack Wireless Power Bank vs Anker 737 Charger 120W GaN Prime 3-Port Wall Fast Charger
Apple
Apple MagSafe Battery Pack Wireless Power Bank
₹10,900
The 1460 mAh on the box is measured at 7.62 V, not the 3.7 V every other power bank quotes, which is why it looks tiny next to a 20000 mAh brick -- the honest comparison is about 3000 mAh equivalent, delivering roughly two thirds of one iPhone charge.
Full details →
Anker
Anker 737 Charger 120W GaN Prime 3-Port Wall Fast Charger
₹7,999
120 W is a total shared across three ports, not a figure any single port sustains while others are in use, and this is the specification that surprises people.
Full details →Who the Apple MagSafe Battery Pack Wireless Power Bank is for
Buy it if: iPhone users who want a top-up that attaches magnetically with no cable at all.
Avoid it if: Anyone who needs real capacity -- a Rs3,299 20000 mAh pack delivers roughly five times as much.
Who the Anker 737 Charger 120W GaN Prime 3-Port Wall Fast Charger is for
Buy it if: Anyone charging a laptop and phone from one adapter who understands the power is shared.
Avoid it if: Anyone expecting full speed on every port simultaneously -- no multi-port charger does that.
Specifications, side by side
1 of 17 rows differ. Differences first.
| Specification | Apple MagSafe Battery Pack Wireless Power Bank | Anker 737 Charger 120W GaN Prime 3-Port Wall Fast Charger |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ₹10,900 | ₹7,999 |
| Weight | 115 g | 200 g |
| Warranty | 1 Year Official Brand Warranty | 1 Year Official Brand Warranty |
| Actual delivery | Roughly 0.6 to 0.7 of a full iPhone charge after wireless conversion losses | not published |
| Attachment | MagSafe magnets -- iPhone 12 or later only | not published |
| Efficiency note | Wireless transfer loses more than a cable would; this trades capacity for not carrying a cable | not published |
| One device | not published | USB-C 1 alone delivers 100 W |
| Output | 5 W wireless on battery, 15 W when the pack itself is plugged into 20 W or more | not published |
| Plug | not published | Indian 2-pin |
| Ports | not published | 2 x USB-C, 1 x USB-A |
| Rated capacity | 1460 mAh at 7.62 V, which is 11.13 Wh | not published |
| Reverse charging | Plugged into a Mac, the iPhone charges first, then the pack | not published |
| Technology | not published | Gallium nitride, which is why it is about half the size of a silicon 120 W charger |
| Three devices | not published | 65 W, 45 W and 10 W respectively |
| Total output | not published | 120 W shared across three ports -- not 120 W per port |
| Two devices | not published | USB-C 1 drops to 65 W and USB-C 2 takes 45 W. A laptop charging at 100 W silently halves when a phone is plugged in |
| Why the mAh looks small | Measured at 7.62 V rather than the usual 3.7 V. At 3.7 V equivalent it is about 3000 mAh | not published |
| Why this happens | not published | A shared power budget. Every multi-port charger does this and few publish the table |
Every row is a figure one or both products record. A blank is a figure the catalogue does not hold, not a zero.
Compare the Apple MagSafe Battery Pack Wireless Power Bank with something else →