Anker 737 Charger 120W GaN Prime 3-Port Wall Fast Charger vs Apple MagSafe Battery Pack Wireless Power Bank
What separates them
These two differ on 1 recorded specification. The Apple MagSafe Battery Pack Wireless Power Bank is ₹2,901 dearer.
Anker 737 Charger 120W GaN Prime 3-Port Wall Fast Charger vs Apple MagSafe Battery Pack Wireless Power Bank
Anker
Anker 737 Charger 120W GaN Prime 3-Port Wall Fast Charger
₹7,999
120 W is a total shared across three ports, not a figure any single port sustains while others are in use, and this is the specification that surprises people.
Full details →Apple
Apple MagSafe Battery Pack Wireless Power Bank
₹10,900
The 1460 mAh on the box is measured at 7.62 V, not the 3.7 V every other power bank quotes, which is why it looks tiny next to a 20000 mAh brick -- the honest comparison is about 3000 mAh equivalent, delivering roughly two thirds of one iPhone charge.
Full details →Who the Anker 737 Charger 120W GaN Prime 3-Port Wall Fast Charger is for
Buy it if: Anyone charging a laptop and phone from one adapter who understands the power is shared.
Avoid it if: Anyone expecting full speed on every port simultaneously -- no multi-port charger does that.
Who the Apple MagSafe Battery Pack Wireless Power Bank is for
Buy it if: iPhone users who want a top-up that attaches magnetically with no cable at all.
Avoid it if: Anyone who needs real capacity -- a Rs3,299 20000 mAh pack delivers roughly five times as much.
Specifications, side by side
1 of 17 rows differ. Differences first.
| Specification | Anker 737 Charger 120W GaN Prime 3-Port Wall Fast Charger | Apple MagSafe Battery Pack Wireless Power Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ₹7,999 | ₹10,900 |
| Weight | 200 g | 115 g |
| Warranty | 1 Year Official Brand Warranty | 1 Year Official Brand Warranty |
| Actual delivery | not published | Roughly 0.6 to 0.7 of a full iPhone charge after wireless conversion losses |
| Attachment | not published | MagSafe magnets -- iPhone 12 or later only |
| Efficiency note | not published | Wireless transfer loses more than a cable would; this trades capacity for not carrying a cable |
| One device | USB-C 1 alone delivers 100 W | not published |
| Output | not published | 5 W wireless on battery, 15 W when the pack itself is plugged into 20 W or more |
| Plug | Indian 2-pin | not published |
| Ports | 2 x USB-C, 1 x USB-A | not published |
| Rated capacity | not published | 1460 mAh at 7.62 V, which is 11.13 Wh |
| Reverse charging | not published | Plugged into a Mac, the iPhone charges first, then the pack |
| Technology | Gallium nitride, which is why it is about half the size of a silicon 120 W charger | not published |
| Three devices | 65 W, 45 W and 10 W respectively | not published |
| Total output | 120 W shared across three ports -- not 120 W per port | not published |
| Two devices | USB-C 1 drops to 65 W and USB-C 2 takes 45 W. A laptop charging at 100 W silently halves when a phone is plugged in | not published |
| Why the mAh looks small | not published | Measured at 7.62 V rather than the usual 3.7 V. At 3.7 V equivalent it is about 3000 mAh |
| Why this happens | A shared power budget. Every multi-port charger does this and few publish the table | not published |
Every row is a figure one or both products record. A blank is a figure the catalogue does not hold, not a zero.
Compare the Anker 737 Charger 120W GaN Prime 3-Port Wall Fast Charger with something else →